Pappu Yadav Seeks Increased Security Following Alleged Bishnoi Gang Threat
Purnia MP Rajesh Ranjan, also known as Pappu Yadav, has formally reached out to the central government to request an upgrade in his security level from ‘Y’ to ‘Z’ after allegedly receiving threats from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang. In an email to Union Home Minister Amit Shah on October 21, Yadav included an audio recording of a threatening phone call, underscoring his need for enhanced protection.
Current Security Provisions and the Difference with ‘Z’ Level:
Under the existing ‘Y’ level security, Yadav is provided with one armed guard for mobile security and an additional guard (with four on rotation) for static protection. However, ‘Z’ security would afford him a stronger protective detail, including six gunmen for mobile security and two guards (plus eight more) for residence security, significantly increasing his safety measures.
Audio Threat and Pappu Yadav’s Stance Against Organized Crime
In the attached audio clip, a voice reportedly warns Yadav’s assistant that the MP should “think before he speaks,” a threat allegedly linked to Yadav’s recent statements claiming he could dismantle the Lawrence Bishnoi gang if permitted by authorities. Yadav made this statement while addressing public concerns regarding India’s law-and-order situation, particularly following the killing of former minister and NCP leader Baba Siddique in Mumbai.
Ongoing Threats Faced by Pappu Yadav and His Family:
Though Yadav did not specify the exact timing of the recent threat call, he mentioned that both he and his family have faced persistent threats since he entered the political arena. He expressed frustration over what he perceives as a lack of response from the state government, despite his previous complaints about similar threats over the years.
Yadav’s Political Background and History of Security Threats:
In his letter to Amit Shah, Pappu Yadav underscored his long-standing political career, stating, “I have been elected once to the Bihar Legislative Assembly and six times to the Lok Sabha. Throughout these years, my family and I have been subject to numerous attacks.” He also recalled past threats from a Maoist organization in Nepal and highlighted that he was previously granted enhanced security in 2015, which was subsequently downgraded in 2019.
Frustration Over Inaction by State and Central Ministries:
Pappu Yadav voiced concern over what he described as inaction by both the Bihar Home Ministry and the Union Home Ministry in addressing his security concerns. Emphasizing the potential danger posed by the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, he called for an immediate upgrade in his security to ‘Z’ level and requested stringent measures at all political events he attends, including police escorts across Bihar.
“I May Be Killed at Any Time”: Yadav’s Urgent Appeal for Protection
In his email, pappu Yadav cautioned that without adequate security, his life remains at risk, stating, “If this is not done, I may be killed at any time.” In response, Purnia Superintendent of Police Kartikeya Sharma acknowledged that they learned of the alleged threat call through media reports and assured that the police are monitoring the situation closely.
Raising Awareness of Public Safety and Organized Crime in India
This appeal for increased security comes as Pappu Yadav continues to publicly address concerns about public safety and the need for greater efforts to combat organized crime across the country. If you want to know cheap web hosting in Pakistan, Hostinger web-Hosting is one of the Best option.
Conclusion:
Pappu Yadav’s urgent request for heightened security serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities faced by public figures in India who actively speak out against crime and corruption. The alleged threat from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang has cast a spotlight on the risks that political leaders and social activists encounter, often as a consequence of their outspoken stances on law and order. Yadav’s appeal for upgraded ‘Z’ level security not only reflects his personal concerns but also underscores the broader need for enhanced protection policies, especially for public figures who frequently engage with sensitive issues.
By sharing details of this threat publicly, Yadav has called attention to the growing influence of organized crime and the gaps in current security arrangements. His long political career and ongoing challenges highlight the necessity for security policies that evolve to meet current threats. This case also emphasizes the importance of cooperation between central and state governments to ensure that those in public service can perform their duties without fear of retribution or violence.
As Yadav awaits a response, his situation serves as a crucial case study in the ongoing efforts to create a safer environment for political figures and activists in India. His call for protection, if met, could pave the way for more robust security protocols for all public servants facing similar threats. Ensuring that public figures have adequate security not only protects individuals but also reinforces the public’s trust in the government’s commitment to law and order, ultimately strengthening democratic governance in India.